AHP has been used for solving multi-criteria resource allocation probl
ems by converting them into equivalent single objective, maximization-
type LP problems. At least two approaches can be identified for such a
pplications. In the first approach, the AHP priorities are used as coe
fficients in the objective function of the LP format, and in the secon
d approach, the benefit-cost ratios are used as the coefficients. This
paper evaluates the two approaches. It is shown here that both the ap
proaches are suitable if the criteria (used in the AHP model) are soug
ht to be maximized. However, they are shown to be inappropriate if the
criteria are sought to be minimized. A new, simple approach is sugges
ted for the latter case and an extension has been proposed to tackle p
roblems with mixed criteria. The implications of the study on other pr
eference elicitation methods have also been pointed out.