Recent petitions to list the fisher (Martes pennanti) under the Endang
ered Species Act have brought attention to fisher conservation. Althou
gh commercial trapping of fishers in California ended in 1946, summari
zing the commercial harvest data can provide a historical perspective
to fisher conservation and may indicate the prevalence of incidental f
isher captures in traps set fur other species. We investigated the rel
ationships between historical fisher harvests and the price paid for f
isher pelts, number of trapping licenses sold, cost of a trapping lice
nse, total number of 5 sympatric species harvested, and their pelt pri
ces in California. The frequency of incidental captures was also asses
sed by interviewing trappers, biologists, and wardens in California. B
etween 1919-1946, relatively few fishers were legally trapped in Calif
ornia (n = 462, (x) over bar = 18.5 annually), and their harvest decli
ned steadily. Fisher harvests were positively related to fisher pelt p
rice but were more strongly related to the number of trapping licenses
sold, indicating that fishers were vulnerable to trappers in general
as opposed to only those trappers specifically targeting them. We esti
mated an incidental capture rate of 1 per 407 set-nights and a mortali
ty-injury rate of 24% from data obtained from 5 trappers in California
. Trappers are an important source of information on the distribution
of fishers and their cooperation is necessary to determine the effects
of incidental capture on fisher populations.