Remediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated sites can be costly and the de
sign process becomes complex in the presence of parameter uncertainty.
Classical decision theory related to remediation design requires the
parameter uncertainties to be stipulated in terms of statistical estim
ates based on site observations. In the absence of detailed data on pa
rameter uncertainty, classical decision theory provides little contrib
ution in designing a risk-based optimal design strategy. Bayesian deci
sion theory, however, allows the use of subjective judgments of the de
signer together with parameter uncertainty in the decision-making proc
ess. In the present work, Bayesian theory is used in developing the th
eoretical framework for risk-based design analysis for soil gas ventin
g operations. Two utility functions, exponential and quadratic, were u
sed in the analysis, identifying the cost, and risk associated with un
der- or over-achieving the site stipulated remediation targets. Prepos
terior analysis provided the information on estimated optimal venting
time, optimal effective how rate and sample size for both utility func
tions, and the applicability of each function. Hypothetical field-scal
e simulations using normal and weathered gasoline were performed to de
monstrate the applicability of Bayesian decision theory based analysis
for practical scale problems.