Surface roughness values are an important consideration in component d
esign and are increasingly specified on engineering drawings. A value
of surface finish (roughness) may be specified so that expensive finis
hing processes are eliminated, thereby reducing costs, or alternativel
y to improve the mechanical properties of a component. The careful fin
ishing of components can lead to longer life, improved efficiency and
other benefits. The investigation reported in this paper was carried o
ut on behalf of a medium sized engineering company who wished to learn
whether a change from uncoated carbide to coated carbide could be eco
nomically justified for finish turning operations. It was desired to i
dentify the most cost effective combination of cutting speed, feed and
tool material for a finish turning operation, useful tool life being
taken when the surface roughness deteriorated beyond a predetermined l
evel. It is shown that the lowest cost per component is achieved by us
ing the highest cutting speed possible on the lathes available within
the company, coupled with the highest cutting tool feed rate commensur
ate with finish turning. Significantly however, it is shown that the l
owest cost when machining with coated carbide is 30% less than when ma
chining with uncoated carbide during finish turning operations.