In this paper I argue that specific mental health law should not exist
and should be replaced by modern guardianship law which is non-discri
minatory and which intervenes according to need rather than diagnostic
classification. Substituted consent provided by a guardian protects t
he patient and the treatment provider. Custody to prevent danger to ot
hers should remain with courts rather than informal proceedings where
individual rights to freedom are less carefully protected. Special men
tal health law stigmatises people with mental illness and degrades the
ir treatment. It also diminishes the standing of the psychiatric profe
ssion which advocates the continuation of such laws.