The primary aim of this article is to test a process model of request
tactic evaluation in two different cultures. It examines possible link
s between the perceptions of interactive constraints (concern for clar
ity, concern for avoiding hurting the hearer's feelings, concern for n
onimposition, concern for avoiding negative evaluation by the hearer,
concern for effectiveness), and likelihood of using specific tactics.
Theory and research drawn from the areas of communication competence,
conversational goals, and requesting behaviors were used to formulate
a causal model of request tactic evaluation. Data to test the proposed
model were drawn from undergraduates studying in Korea (N = 296) and
the U.S. (N = 299). The results indicated that in both cultures, perce
ived effectiveness functions as a mediating variable between the four
interactive constraints and perceived likelihood of use. Among Korean
participants, two social-relational constraints (concern for avoiding
negative evaluation by the hearer, and concern for avoiding hurting th
e other's feelings) substantially contribute to the prediction of effe
ctiveness. On the ether hand, among the U.S. participants, clarity was
an extremely strong predictor of perceived effectiveness of tactics.
Perceived effectiveness played an equally important role in the predic
tion of likelihood of use in both cultures. The implications of the mo
del for theory and practice are discussed.