C. Faravelli et al., EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SOMATOFORM DISORDERS - A COMMUNITY SURVEY IN FLORENCE, Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 32(1), 1997, pp. 24-29
Since the exclusion of somatic causes is necessary for somatoform diso
rders (SMD) to be diagnosed, there is little information on the preval
ence of such disorders in the community. As the method we have previou
sly developed [general practitioners (GPs) with psychiatric training w
ho interview samples representative of the general population] seemed
to be appropriate to deal with the problem, we carried out a community
survey focused on somatoform disorders. The prevalence rates of DSM-I
II-R somatoform disorders were studied in two wards of the city of Flo
rence. In order to be representative of the general population, 673 su
bjects randomly selected were interviewed by their own GP. Four GPs, a
ll with specific training in psychiatry, participated in the interview
ing process. The 1-year prevalence figures were as follows: 0.7% body
dysmorphic disorder; 4.5% hypochondriasis; 0.6% somatoform pain disord
er; 0.3% conversion disorder; 0.7% somatization disorder; 13.8% undiff
erentiated somatoform disorder. No specific comorbidity was found betw
een somatoform disorders and mood or anxiety disorders. Although the s
ample investigated was small, this study may be seen as one of the fir
st in an area where knowledge is still scant. The prevalence rates of
somatoform disorders were generally found to be slightly lower than ex
pected.