An earlier paper (Part 1, this issue) dealt with the use of sensitivit
y analysis for the design of a slug,test that would give reasonably ac
curate estimates of the aquifer parameters by an informed choice of th
e number and times of measurements. An investigation of the radial dep
endence of the Cooper et al. analytical solution for a slug test in a
confined aquifer shows that the use of one or more observation wells c
an vastly improve the parameter estimates, particularly the estimate o
f the storage parameter. Generally, the observation well must be fairl
y close (about 10 m or less) to the slugged well to be effective. The
storage coefficient must be small in order to see the effect of the sl
ug at greater distances from the stressed well. Since the temporal and
spatial dependence of the sensitivities for transmissivity and storag
e are considerably different, the addition of one or more observation
wells will substantially reduce the correlation between these two para
meters, which will result in much better estimates than are usually ob
tained in slug tests. These ideas are illustrated using typical data r
epresentative of our research sites.