Rt. Mullen et Dj. Gifford, ISOCITRATE LYASE FROM GERMINATED LOBLOLLY-PINE MEGAGAMETOPHYTES - ENZYME-PURIFICATION AND IMMUNOCHARACTERIZATION, Plant physiology and biochemistry, 33(1), 1995, pp. 87-95
The glyoxysomal enzyme isocitrate lyase (EC 4.1.3.1) was purified to h
omogeneity from germinated loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagametoph
ytes isolated 9 days after seed imbibition. During initial stages of t
he purification, separation on DE-52 (diethylaminoethyl) cellulose res
olved at least two separate forms of the enzyme (isocitrate lyase A an
d B). Both forms are immunologically distinct, with isocitrate lyase A
representing over 90% of total enzyme activity in the megagametophyte
. Subsequently, form A was used for enzyme purification. Isocitrate ly
ase A was purified from contaminating catalase by a procedure which in
volved gel filtration, hydroxylapatite and octyl-Sepharose CL-4B hydro
phobic interaction chromatography. Native isocitrate lyase A is a tetr
amer with a molecular mass of 270 kDa, and when analyzed on 7% sodium
dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels, purified isocitrate lyase A migra
ted as two distinct bands. Both polypeptides appear to represent indiv
idual subunits of isocitrate lyase A with molecular masses of 62.5 and
64 kDa, respectively. Polyclonal antibodies raised against purified i
socitrate lyase A were demonstrated to be monospecific by immunotitrat
ion, immunoprecipitation, and protein blotting experiments. Both isoci
trate lyase A subunits were antigentically cross-reactive, with the 62
.5 kDa subunit appearing as the dominant form at all stages examined.
Protein blot analysis of various cell-free extracts including purified
enzyme, isolated megagametophyte glyoxysomal fractions, and extracts
from mature and germinated megagametophytes and embryos indicated no c
hange in the enzymes monomeric molecular masses during These stages. P
rotein blot experiments further indicated that isocitrate lyase A in b
oth tile megagametophyte and embryo were physically similar, and that
protein levels of both enzymes increased with the onset of lipid reser
ve mobilization.