AIM: To evaluate whether there might be some difference in the action
modes of nimodipine (Nim) and felodipine (Fel). METHODS: Compare the i
nhibitory effects of Nim and Fel with that of verapamil (Ver) as a rep
resentative of phenylalklamine on norepinephrine (NE)- and CaCl2-evoke
d contractions of human arteries. RESULTS: In Ca2+- free and high K+ d
epolarized solution, inhibitory effects of Nim, Fel, and Ver were more
potent on CaCl2-induced contractions on isolated human arteries than
those on NE-induced contractions. In CaCl2-induced contraction, the pD
(2) values for Nim, Fel, and Ver were 7. 5, 7. 42, 6. 35 on uterine ar
teries; 7. 38, 7. 65, 7. 20 on mesenteric arteries and 7. 87, 9. 10, 7
. 32 on renal arteries , respectively. Ver inhibited 2 components of N
E-evoked contraction, while Nim and Fel only inhibited extracellular C
a2+-dependent contractions. CONCLUSION: The result indicates that Fel
has a selective action on human renal arteries.