COMPLIANCE WITH PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER

Citation
Ia. Olivotto et al., COMPLIANCE WITH PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(1), 1997, pp. 216-222
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
0732183X
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
216 - 222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(1997)15:1<216:CWPGFN>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Purpose: Practice guidelines for cancer management have been in use in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, since the mid 1970s. T o evaluate practice guideline compliance, treatment received was compa red with treatment recommended in a population-based cohort of women w ith breast cancer. Methods: All incident cases (n = 939) of invasive, pathologically node-negative breast cancer diagnosed in 1991 were iden tified from the BC Cancer Registry. Treatment details were abstracted from cancer clinic records for cases referred to the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) (n = 661) and original source documents for nonreferred cases, Management decisions were considered compliant if the patient received the recommended treatment or was entered onto a randomized trial of t he modality being assessed, Results: Overall compliance with adjuvant therapy guidelines was 97% for radiotherapy, 96% for chemotherapy, and 89% far tamoxifen, An oncology specialist was consulted by 94% of pat ients with an indication for adjuvant treatment and by 58% of those wi thout an indication (odds ratio [OR] = 10.7: 95% confidence interval, 7.0 to 16.4). Compliance with a guideline to deliver radiotherapy was 95%; with chemotherapy, 77%; and with tamoxifen, 68%, Compliance with a guideline that stated no adjuvant treatment was indicated was 99% fo r radiotherapy, 98% for chemotherapy, and 92% for tamoxifen, Noncompli ance: among patients with an indication for treatment was related to n onreferral to an oncology specialist and less complete implementation of guideline changes in the community as compared with cancer center p ractices, Conclusion: Compliance was high, but scheduled updating and more effective community implementation could further improve consiste ncy of care. (C) 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.