Md. Brundage et al., TRADING TREATMENT TOXICITY FOR SURVIVAL IN LOCALLY ADVANCED NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(1), 1997, pp. 330-340
Purpose: To determine how patients weigh potential survival benefits a
gainst the potential toxicity of different treatment strategies for lo
cally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Specifically, we we
re interested in what improvement in survival probability patients wou
ld want to have before accepting more toxic therapy. Patients and Meth
ods: Fifty-six outpatients who herd experienced lung cancer (n = 22) o
r prostate cancer (n = 34), and 20 clinic nurses and radiation therapy
technologists participated. A treatment trade-off interview was condu
cted with each participant that compared low-dose versus high-dose rad
iotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy versus combination chemo-radiothe
rapy. Preferences for treatments were assessed by systematically incre
asing the hypothetical survival advantage of the more toxic treatment
until the person reached his or her threshold for choosing the more to
xic treatment, Results: A wide range of thresholds was observed for bo
th groups. The distributions of survival advantage thresholds for sung
cancer and prostate cancer patients were not significantly different
but were generally lower thresholds than those declared by staff. If t
he 3-year survival advantage wets 10%, 60% of patients and 15% of staf
f would consider combination therapy over high-dose radiotherapy, With
in patients, apparent willingness to consider more toxic treatments wa
s not significantly related to age, sex, education, or preferred role
in decision making, The treatment trade-off method had good test-retes
t reliability, Conclusion: There is great interindividual variability
in willingness to accept aggressive treatments for locally advanced NS
CLC, When choosing NSCLC treatment, each patient should be provided wi
th comprehensive information about the options so that he or she may e
xpress his or her preferences should he or she wish to participate in
the decision. (C) 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.