Ch. Sherman et al., ANALYSIS OF HARMONIC DISTORTION IN ELECTROACOUSTIC TRANSDUCERS UNDER INDIRECT DRIVE CONDITIONS, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(1), 1997, pp. 297-314
Nonlinear transducer equations for the six major types of electroacous
tic transducers (electrostatic, variable reluctance, moving coil, piez
oelectric, electrostrictive, and magnetostrictive) are formulated in a
common way and solved approximately by perturbation analysis for indi
rect drive, i.e., current drive of electric field transducers and volt
age drive of magnetic field transducers. The direct drive analysis, i.
e., voltage drive of electric field transducers and current drive of m
agnetic field transducers, was given in J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 98, 1596-1
611 (1995). Expressions and graphs are given for some of the indirect
drive harmonics which apply to all six transducer types. The solutions
for direct and indirect drive are compared, and some of the differenc
es are discussed with emphasis on the question of which drive gives lo
wer harmonic distortion. No answer to this question has been found tha
t is applicable to all nonlinear mechanisms in all transducers at all
frequencies. However, it is shown that for transducers of all types wi
th low electrical loss operated near resonance direct drive usually gi
ves lower second harmonics. The exceptions occur when mechanical sprin
gs are the dominant nonlinearity and the electromechanical coupling is
very high; then indirect drive gives lower second harmonics. It is sh
own how the results, although based on simple lumped parameter models,
can be applied in some cases to more complex transducer structures. (
C) 1997 Acoustical Society of America.