The correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a per
son's unique and enduring dispositions from behaviors that can be enti
rely explained by the situations in which they occur. Although this te
ndency is one of the most fundamental phenomena in social psychology,
its causes and consequences remain poorly understood. This article ske
tches an intellectual history of the correspondence bias as an evolvin
g problem in social psychology, describes 4 mechanisms (lack of awaren
ess, unrealistic expectations, inflated categorizations, and incomplet
e corrections) that produce distinct forms of correspondence bias, and
discusses how the consequences of correspondence-biased inferences ma
y perpetuate such inferences.