Cmje. Vandenbrouckegrauls et al., BACTERIAL AND VIRAL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY, HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGE PROPERTIES OF 4 FILTRATION DEVICES, The Journal of hospital infection, 29(1), 1995, pp. 45-56
Four devices used for filtration of microorganisms and/or for heating
and moistening the ventilated air during mechanical ventilation were e
valuated. This evaluation included measurement of bacterial and viral
removal efficiency, heat and moisture exchange properties, dead space
and air flow resistance. The devices included: Pall BB50T and DAR Ster
ivent (filtration devices); DAR Hygrobac and Gibeck Humid-vent [heat a
nd moisture exchangers (HMEs)]. The two devices which are primarily co
nceived as filters had the highest bacterial and viral removal efficie
ncy (titre reduction of 10(5)-10(6) for bacteria and of 10(4)-10(5) fo
r viruses), while removal efficiencies of the HME devices were lower:
titre reduction of 10(4) for bacteria and 10(1)-10(3) for viruses. As
expected, heat and moisture output of HMEs was better than that of fil
ters. In mechanical ventilation, dead space and air flow resistance ar
e important properties of devices, which might disturb efficient venti
lation. There were only minor differences in dead space and air flow r
esistance. Resistance to airflow in the HMEs was increased by nebuliza
tion of medication (mesna) unlike that of the filters.