Ja. Schreifels et al., A COMPARISON OF X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY AND AUGER-ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY DEPTH PROFILES FOR MAGNESIUM IMPLANTS, Applied surface science, 84(1), 1995, pp. 23-29
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Condensed Matter","Chemistry Physical","Materials Science, Coatings & Films
The analysis of depth profiles when magnesium is present gives rise to
several analytical problems with either X-ray photoelectron spectrosc
opy (XPS) or Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). With both techniques t
he relative sensitivity is low for the main transition usually employe
d, i.e., the 2s photoemission line in XPS and the KLL transition in el
ectron-excited AES. With XPS, the A1 X-ray-excited Mg KLL peak has a r
elative intensity that is greater than the 2s transition, but not with
Mg radiation. The peak-to-peak height of the electron-excited AES pea
k can vary with the chemical state of Mg. Also, in some instances over
lapping peaks can cause problems. In this study Mg was implanted into
metal foils at various levels. Depth profiles were obtained with both
XPS and AES, and the instrument-based quantitative analysis computer r
outines were used with slight modifications. It was found that each te
chnique had its own set of advantages, and both approaches gave roughl
y comparable profiles. The estimated maximum amounts were below those
anticipated from the implant conditions. As expected with XPS, chemica
l effects could easily be determined. However, a relative sensitivity
factor was needed to use the X-ray-excited KLL Auger transition. With
AES certain low-level contaminants were more easily detected and monit
ored. Overall, the XPS profiles appeared to offer better results in mo
st respects for these systems. Other factors, e.g., time of analysis,
data treatment methods, detection limits, etc., will be discussed also
.