H. Meinke et al., EVALUATION OF RADIATION AND TEMPERATURE DATA GENERATORS IN THE AUSTRALIAN TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS USING CROP SIMULATION-MODELS, Agricultural and forest meteorology, 72(3-4), 1995, pp. 295-316
Long-term, historical weather data are needed to conduct crop simulati
on analyses. However, the network of weather recording stations which
collect all necessary daily weather data (commonly rainfall, solar rad
iation, maximum and minimum temperature) for such analyses is sparse.
Frequently only rainfall is recorded. Thus, weather data generation te
chniques are required for three situations: (i) where only rainfall da
ta are available, (ii) where both rainfall and temperature data are av
ailable, but radiation is missing, and (iii) where records are otherwi
se complete, but techniques are required to fill short periods of miss
ing data. Three weather generation techniques are compared, termed her
e (i) Bristow and Campbell's method, (ii) TAMSIM and (iii) WGEN. Metho
ds (ii) and (iii) were used to generate temperature and radiation data
to accompany recorded rainfall records, and methods (i)-(iii) to gene
rate a solar radiation record to accompany recorded temperature and ra
infall records. Data from four stations in tropical and subtropical Au
stralia with long-term complete weather records were used to compare a
ctual with generated data sets. Results were evaluated firstly by comp
aring the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of generated and actu
al values, and secondly by comparing CDFs calculated from the output o
f three crop simulation models used with the generated and actual data
sets. Generally the distributions of radiation and temperature differ
ed significantly. However, when the weather data sets were used by sim
ulation models to estimate biomass, only 10 of the 50 CDFs differed si
gnificantly. When both temperature and radiation were generated, 30% o
f CDFs from TAMSIM and 20% of WGEN differed significantly. When only r
adiation was generated, 40% of CDFs generated by the Bristow and Campb
ell's method, 10% of WGEN and none of TAMSIM differed significantly. A
ll methods simulated the more temperate sites with higher precision th
an the wet, tropical site. Simulated yields showed a similar pattern.
It was concluded that where both temperature and radiation data have t
o be generated, WGEN is appropriate because it contains a stochastic e
lement and thus simulates catastrophic events such as frosts. Where on
ly radiation generation is required, both WGEN and TAMSIM performed ad
equately. Where temperature or radiation data sets are complete except
for occasional missing days, TAMSIM was considered to be the most app
ropriate. In cases were the objective is not to conduct long-term simu
lation analyses, Bristow and Campbell's method appeared more appropria
te because of its ability to better simulate the day to day variation
in solar radiation.