CAPACITY OF RING AND LIGHT SENSE PERIMETRY IN THE TOPICAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE VISUAL PATHWAY

Citation
Jh. Meyer et al., CAPACITY OF RING AND LIGHT SENSE PERIMETRY IN THE TOPICAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE VISUAL PATHWAY, Neuro-ophthalmology, 14(6), 1994, pp. 337-344
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology,Neurosciences
Journal title
Neuro-ophthalmology
ISSN journal
01658107 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
337 - 344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-8107(1994)14:6<337:CORALS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Ring perimetry is a novel method which determines peripheral resolutio n rather than differential light sensitivity (DLS). The authors invest igated the capacity of ring perimetry in the topical diagnosis of neur o-ophthalmological lesions in comparison to that of DLS perimetry. Sev enty-five patients with an established diagnosis of a single ophthalmo logical disorder were chosen for the study. They underwent a full clin ical examination and both the 'ring test' with the ring perimeter Opht himus (High-Tech-Vision Inc.) and the GI-program with the Octopus I-2- 3 (Interzeag Inc.). The main investigator who knew all clinical findin gs and the history ascribed each pair of visual fields to one of seven different topical diagnoses: (I) optic media, (2) retina, (3) optic d isc, (4) optic nerve, (5) chiasm, (6) retrochiasmal pathway, and (7) n ormal. He selected five or six sample fields of each group and showed them to two experienced ophthalmologists. They had to assign the field s to one of the seven topical diagnoses. The whole test was repeated s ix weeks later. With ring perimetry 64%, and with DLS perimetry 65% of the assignments were correct. Hence, the efficacy of both methods was very similar, but the time needed for the ring perimetry (5.5 min) wa s about half that needed for the DLS perimetry (II.5 min).