MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICAL INSTABILITY AFTER ICD IMPLANTATION

Citation
B. Dijkman et al., MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICAL INSTABILITY AFTER ICD IMPLANTATION, PACE, 18(1), 1995, pp. 148-151
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Engineering, Biomedical
ISSN journal
01478389
Volume
18
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Part
2
Pages
148 - 151
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-8389(1995)18:1<148:MOEIAI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Postoperative ventricular arrhythmias were studied in 52 patients rece iving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). A group of 9 pat ients was identified who experienced electrical instability (EI). The lead approach was thoracotomy in 6 and nonthoracotomy in 3 patients. I n 8 of 9 patients VTs started soon after surgery. There was no evidenc e of ischemia, cardiac failure, electrolyte imbalance, or drug intoxic ation. The severity of ventricular arrhythmias varied from a considera ble increase in incidence of well-tolerated VTs in 3 patients (1 inces sant) to poorly tolerated frequent VTs in 6 patients (2 incessant). In 4 patients VTs led to cardiac failure. Ventricular arrhythmias during El were refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in 7 of 9 patients. In 3 patients VTs accelerated into fast VT or VF with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or cardioversion. The successful management of EI was: se dation in 4 patients (3 with midazolam 2 with temazepam), ATP and AAD in 2 patients, AAD and hemodynamic support in 2 patients, spontaneous resolution in 2 patient. All patients survived the period of postopera tive EI. Two patients had a relapse of EI at 2- and 9-months postimpla ntation, respectively, one of whom eventually died. Conclusions: EI oc curred in 17% of patients after ICD implantation, had a varying degree of severity and required an individualized approach. Control of El wi th AAD was successful in only 2 of 9 patients. Sedation with midazolam was useful in the management of EI.