Pjd. Andrews et al., FACIAL SENSORY EVOKED MUSCLE POTENTIALS DURING LABOR - A CONTINUOUS OBJECTIVE MONITOR OF ADEQUACY OF ANALGESIA, Anaesthesia, 50(1), 1995, pp. 9-13
We prospectively studied the relationship between upper facial sensory
-evoked muscle potential amplitude, uterine contraction amplitude and
heart rate in 20 healthy parturients during the first stage of labour.
Monitoring began when minimal pain was reported and continued until s
evere pain occurred and extradural analgesia was established. Pain int
ensity was assessed by each patient using a 10 cm visual analogue scor
e. Heart rate was recorded using a pulse oximeter. Sensory evoked musc
le potential was derived from frontalis biopotentials that were rectif
ied, integrated and digitised by an Anaesthesia and Brain activity Mon
itor (Datex, Helsinki, Finland). An additional signal filter was inclu
ded in the pre-amplifier to improve the signal-to -noise ratio. The rm
s amplitude of successive 10s samples of sensory evoked muscle potenti
al, as well as heart rate and the output from an external tocotransduc
er, were then graphically displayed to allow assessment of temporal re
lationships. The data were assessed using correlation analysis and hyp
ergeometric probability distribution. Before extradural analgesia (mea
n pain score 7.5 cm, SD 1.5 cm) a significant relationship was demonst
rated between sensory evoked muscle potential and uterine contraction,
p < 0.001). No constant relationship was seen between heart rate and
uterine contraction. Following extradural analgesia (mean pain scores
of 2.1 cm, SD 1.3 cm) a variable relationship between sensory evoked m
uscle potential and uterine contraction amplitude, and heart rate and
uterine contraction, was recorded. A continuous display of the relatio
nship between filtered sensory evoked muscle potentials of the frontal
is muscle and uterine contraction may, in the future, permit an object
ive assessment of the adequacy of analgesia following extradural analg
esia for the pain of labour.