OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PHARMACOLOGICAL ERECTION TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION

Citation
H. Hattat et al., OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PHARMACOLOGICAL ERECTION TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION, Journal of andrology, 15, 1994, pp. 47-49
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Andrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01963635
Volume
15
Year of publication
1994
Supplement
S
Pages
47 - 49
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-3635(1994)15:<47:OEWPET>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Administration of vasoactive drugs intracavernously is a well-known ea sily used and inexpensive alternative in treatment of a certain group of patients with erectile dysfunction. There are a few drugs used for this purpose, but we prefer papaverine as the first choice because it is easily available and inexpensive in our country. We used alprostadi l only in nonresponders to papaverine or if there was any complication with papaverine. We present a series of 69 patients, 24 with psychoge nic (34.8%), 27 with organic (39.1%), and 18(26.1)with mixed etiology of erectile dysfunction, treated with intracavernous self-injection th erapy. Mean follow-up of the patients was 13.6 months (7-30 months). I n this study, 3,430 papaverine and 780 alprostadil injections were per formed in 56 and 13 patients, respectively. In 75% of the papaverine i njections and in 83% of the alprostadil injections, erections were ach ieved sufficient for sexual intercourse. During the follow-up, there w ere not any abnormal alterations in liver function tests. The main com plaint of the patients who used papaverine was a burning sensation (98 %) during administration of the drug, which did not last more than 1 m inute. Of 13 patients in the alprostadil group, 56.9% of the patients complained mainly of discomfort during erection. We concluded that int racavernous therapy is a good and inexpensive option in the management of erectile dysfunction in carefully selected patients.