TRUE ABSORPTION AND RETENTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL IRON IS MORE EFFICIENT WHEN IRON IS ADMINISTERED EVERY 3 DAYS RATHER THAN DAILY TO IRON-NORMAL AND IRON-DEFICIENT RATS
Fe. Viteri et al., TRUE ABSORPTION AND RETENTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL IRON IS MORE EFFICIENT WHEN IRON IS ADMINISTERED EVERY 3 DAYS RATHER THAN DAILY TO IRON-NORMAL AND IRON-DEFICIENT RATS, The Journal of nutrition, 125(1), 1995, pp. 82-91
Absorption of daily iron supplements is inefficient. Detailed absorpti
on patterns of FeSO4 supplements simulating World Health Organization-
recommended doses were studied in iron-deficient and iron-normal male
Sprague-Dawley rats. For 12 d after weaning, the rats were fed a preme
al containing <20 (iron-deficient group) or 400 mu g Fe (iron-normal g
roup) twice daily followed by iron-free AIN-76 diet for 1 h. Then, bot
h groups (iron-deficient and -normal) were divided in three groups, on
e continuing without change and two receiving 4000 mu g of premeal Fe
either daily or every 3 d to match intestinal mucosa renewal time. Foo
d intake, growth, hemoglobin concentration and periodic Fe-59-labeled
iron absorption and rate of loss were determined. Iron-deficient rats
became anemic, and ate and grew less. Iron absorption was stable in no
rmal (34.2%), deficient (89.7%) and normal, intermittently supplemente
d (9.5%) groups. Absorption decreased logarithmically in daily supplem
ented rats, whereas in iron-deficient, intermittently supplemented rat
s absorption decreased slowly and linearly. Rates of iron loss were si
gnificantly accelerated in daily supplemented rats. Thirteen-day total
iron retention in intermittently supplemented normal and deficient ra
ts was 62 and 86%, respectively, of that of daily supplemented rats. I
ron supplementation timed to match mucosal renewal is more efficient.