Olecranization of the patella is a technique employed by some to maint
ain the normal anatomic relationship of the femorotibial articulation
following posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repairs and reconstruction
s. It involves temporarily placing a large diameter pin longitudinally
through the patella and into the tibia. The patella thus becomes a bo
ny shelf and, in theory holds the tibia forward protecting the knee fr
om a posterior drawer force. This technique appears desirable in that
it allows postoperative knee motion while theoretically affording prot
ection to the PCL. Unfortunately, it is based on an erroneous concept
that the spatial relationship of the patella and tibia remains constan
t throughout knee flexion. Negative experience at our institution with
this technique prompted our investigation. Using lateral radiographs
of 20 normal knees taken at four different positions of flexion, we st
udied the relative motion that occurs between the patella and tibia in
the sagittal plane during knee flexion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees,
and defined two separate arcs of patellar motion. The patellar tendon
arc is a 30 degrees arc through which the patella traverses relative t
o the tibia during knee flexion. The patellar arc is a 22 degrees arc
on which the patella flexes relative to itself during knee flexion. We
also studied the effect that olecranization of the patella has on the
PCL in six cadaver knees. Using a combination of direct tension measu
rement, radiographic measurement, and fluoroscopy, we found that olecr
anization of the patella not only fails to protect the PCL, but actual
ly induces a detrimental posterior drawer force during knee flexion. B
ased on clinical experience and laboratory findings, we strongly recom
mend that olecranization of the patella be abandoned as a means of pos
toperative ligamentous protection following PCL repair or reconstructi
on.