Three experiments examined whether sentences interpretable as metaphor
ical and literal expressions differed on three components of processin
g: perceptual decoding, sense selection, and integration of terms. In
Experiments 1 and 2 metaphorical words were identified more readily th
an literal words on separate tests of perceptual identification and wo
rd recognition In Experiment 3 the conveyed meaning of a metaphor was
not recalled better than a literal interpretation of the same target s
entence. It is concluded that metaphorical and literal sentences utili
ze separate perceptual and selectional decoding strategies, but do not
differ with respect to comprehension processes once metaphorical and
literal referents are instantiated. Discussion is given as to whether
these differences constitute a separate metaphor strategy.