This study tested the hypothesis that clinicians can agree on two aspe
cts of a cognitive-behavioral case formulation: the client's overt pro
blems and underlying cognitive mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, 46
clinicians listened to part or all of an initial interview for two an
xious, depressed clients and then listed each client's overt difficult
ies and rated each client's underlying cognitive mechanisms When group
s of five clinicians were considered, clinicians showed moderate agree
ment in listing overt problems, and except for one type of belief (dsy
functional attitudes) for one client high agreement on ratings of unde
rlying cognitive mechanisms.