When complete-denture wearers are treated with from four to six implan
ts and mandibular implant-borne prostheses, masticatory performance im
proves. No significant improvement has been observed with two implants
and implant-mucosa-borne overdentures, suggesting that the masticator
y performance of edentulous subjects depends on the degree of support
for their mandibular prostheses by implants or alveolar mucosa. To ver
ify this hypothesis, we studied, in a randomized clinical trial, the c
omminution of an artificial test food during mastication The trial inv
olved the provision of a new maxillary denture and either a new conven
tional mandibular denture, a mandibular overdenture retained by two pe
rmucosal cylindric implants through a single bar-clip attachment, or a
mandibular overdenture retained by a transmandibular implant through
five clips on a triple-bar construction with cantilever extensions. In
comparison with the subjects wearing mandibular implant-retained over
dentures, the subjects with conventional complete dentures needed betw
een 1.5 and 3.6 times more chewing strokes to achieve an equivalent re
duction in particle size. No differences in masticatory performance an
d efficiency were found between the subjects who had received two perm
ucosal cylindric implants and those who had received a transmandibular
implant. The results suggest that the increased retention and stabili
ty of the mandibular denture, rather than the degree of support by imp
lants or alveolar mucosa, determine the wearer's ability to comminute
food during mastication.