Ac. Ferguson et al., EVALUATION OF SERUM EOSINOPHILIC CATIONIC PROTEIN AS A MARKER OF DISEASE-ACTIVITY IN CHRONIC ASTHMA, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 95(1), 1995, pp. 23-28
Background: Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) has been promoted
as a direct marker of eosinophilic inflammation of the bronchi, especi
ally helpful in patients with asymptomatic asthma. Objective: To evalu
ate serum ECP against indirect clinical markers of disease activity, w
e compared symptom score, bronchial obstruction, bronchial responsiven
ess, and blood eosinophil counts with serum ECP levels in children wit
h symptomatic and asymptomatic chronic asthma and assessed ECP in othe
rs with allergic rhinitis alone. Methods: Twenty-four children with sy
mptomatic asthma, 10 children with asymptomatic asthma, and 16 childre
n with allergic rhinitis were studied. Measurements were made by stand
ardized symptom questionnaire, spirometry, inhalation challenge with h
istamine or methacholine, blood eosinophil counts, and radioimmunoassa
y of serum ECP. Results: There was no difference in serum ECP levels b
etween the symptomatic asthma, asymptomatic asthma, or rhinitis groups
, and most values were within the normal range. Activated eosinophil c
ounts were higher in subjects with symptomatic asthma than in those wi
th asymptomatic asthma but not in subjects with rhinitis. Serum ECP co
rrelated with eosinophil counts (p < 0.01) but not symptom score, forc
ed expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), forced expiratory flow, mid
-expiratory phase (FEF(25-75)), or provocative concentration causing a
20% fall in FEV(1) (PC20). Symptom scores correlated with PC20 (p < 0
.005) and FEF(25-75) (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Serum ECP is a poor indic
ator of disease activity in chronic asthma and cannot differentiate br
onchial from nasal inflammation.