A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED STUDY OF ORAL VERAPAMIL AS A CHEMOSENSITIZER TO REVERSE DRUG-RESISTANCE IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY MYELOMA - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
Ws. Dalton et al., A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED STUDY OF ORAL VERAPAMIL AS A CHEMOSENSITIZER TO REVERSE DRUG-RESISTANCE IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY MYELOMA - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY, Cancer, 75(3), 1995, pp. 815-820
Background. Multiple myeloma is considered to be a drug responsive dis
ease; however, there is no cure for this disease and virtually all pat
ients will develop drug resistance. One form of drug resistance that h
as been documented is the multidrug resistance phenotype or MDR. Metho
ds. A randomized trial of the combination of vincristine, doxorubicin,
and dexamethasone (VAD) and VAD plus oral verapamil (VAD/v) in drug r
efractory multiple myeloma patients was performed by the Southwestern
Oncology Group. Verapamil was used as a chemosensitizing agent to atte
mpt to overcome of prevent MDR and improve the therapeutic outcome. Re
sults. Response rates between the two treatment arms were similar with
an overall response rate of 41% for the VAD alone arm and 36% for the
VAD/v arm. Overall survival of patients was also similar with a media
n survival of 10 months for the VAD arm and 13 months for the VAD/v ar
m. The toxicity profile was also similar for both treatments, with mye
losuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. No significant correla
tion was observed between expression of P-glycoprotein, serum verapami
l levels, and response to therapy. Conclusions. No beneficial effect w
as observed from the addition of oral verapamil to the VAD chemotherap
y regimen for the treatment of drug-resistant myeloma patients. More e
ffective and less toxic chemosensitizers are needed to study the role
of chemosensitizers in reversing MDR in the clinic.