L. London et al., REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A FIELD KIT FOR ESTIMATION OF CHOLINESTERASE IN WHOLE-BLOOD, Occupational and environmental medicine, 52(1), 1995, pp. 57-64
Objectives-To evaluate a spectrophotometric field kit (Test-Mate-OF) f
or repeatability and validity in comparison with reference laboratory
methods and to model its anticipated sensitivity and specificity based
on these findings. Methods-76 farm workers between the age of 20 and
55, of whom 30 were pesticide applicators exposed to a range of organo
phosphates the preceding 10 days, had taken for plasma cholinesterase
(PCE) and erythrocyte cholinesterase (ECE) measurement by field kit or
laboratory methods. Paired blinded duplicate samples were taken from
subgroups in the sample to assess repeatability of laboratory and fiel
d kit methods. Field kits were also used to test venous blood in one s
ubgroup. The variance obtained for the field kit tests was then applie
d to two hypothetical scenarios that used published action guidelines
to model the kit's sensitivity and specificity. Results-Repeatability
for FCE was much poorer and for ECE slightly poorer than that of labor
atory measures. A substantial upward bias for field kit ECE relative t
o laboratory measurements was found. Sensitivity of the kit to a 40% d
rop in FCE was 67%, whereas that for ECE was 89%. Specificity of the k
it with no change in mean of the population was 100% for ECE and 91% f
or PCE. Conclusion-Field kit ECE estimation seems to be sufficiently r
epeatable for surveillance activities, whereas PCE does not. Repeatabi
lity of both tests seems to be too low for use in epidemiological dose
-response investigations. Further research is indicated to characteris
e the upward bias in ECE estimation on the kit.