Purpose: This retrospective review of femorodistal vein grafts was ana
lyzed to determine the usefulness of various graft surveillance criter
ia. Method: The surveillance schedule involved evaluations at 1 month,
every 3 months the first year, and then every 6 months. Salvage inter
vention or graft occlusion occurring within the next follow-up interva
l defined surveillance end points. One hundred two grafts (329 surveil
lance visits) had an ankle/brachial index (ABI). A duplex scanning-det
ermined midgraft peak systolic flow velocity (PSPV) was available for
81 grafts (262 visits). Forty-eight grafts (137 visits) had both a PSF
V and entire graft duplex scanning (EGDS) to determine stenosis greate
r than 50%, whereas 40 grafts (91 visits) had simultaneous ABI and EGD
S. Results: When a greater than 15% decrease in ABI denoted an abnorma
l surveillance study result, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 24.3
% and negative predictive value of 94.5% were noted. Similarly, a PSPV
cutoff of less than 3 5 cm/sec demonstrated values of 26.3% and 94.2%
, respectively. When an EGDS of greater than 50% stenosis or a PSFV of
less than 35 cm/sec were the cutoff criteria, the PPV was 36.7% and n
egative predictive value 99.1%, whereas characterizing abnormal result
s further with ABI (>15% down arrow) increased the PPV to 83.3%. Concl
usion: The combination of an EGDS, midgraft PSFV, and ABI provides opt
imal follow-up for our patients with a femorodistal vein graft.