Mh. Ferkin et Re. Johnston, MEADOW VOLES, MICROTUS-PENNSYLVANICUS, USE MULTIPLE SOURCES OF SCENT FOR SEX RECOGNITION, Animal behaviour, 49(1), 1995, pp. 37-44
Although many sources of sexually specific chemical signals have been
identified, few attempts have been made to identify all the sources of
sex-specific information in any species or to determine whether the v
arious cues that provide this information have the same communicative
functions. Sources of sex-specific odour information were identified u
sing a preference task in meadow voles. An examination was made of the
amount of time that long-photoperiod male and female voles investigat
ed different scents from opposite- and same-sex conspecifics. The data
indicate that there was a highly localized pattern of sexual informat
ion on the bodies of meadow voles. Three scents were preferentially in
vestigated by opposite-sex subjects: both male and female voles invest
igated scents from urine, faeces and the anogenital area of the opposi
te sex more than those of the same sex. Two additional scents resulted
in sexual preferences, but not in a symmetrical fashion. Males invest
igated scents from the mouth of females over the mouth scent of males,
but females showed no preference. Both males and females investigated
scent from the posterolateral region of males more than those of fema
les. Mouth and posterolateral area may provide different information a
nd/or have different functions compared to the sex-specific scents fro
m urine, faeces and the anogenital area.