Rl. Punamaki et Sj. Kokko, REASONS FOR CONSULTATION AND EXPLANATIONS OF ILLNESS AMONG FINNISH PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS, Sociology of health & illness, 17(1), 1995, pp. 42-64
The aim of this study is to describe triggers to consultation, and to
further understanding of how patients construct explanations for what
is wrong with them. Patients consulting a general practitioner were in
terviewed about the process that had led to their consultation and exp
lanations for the causes of their illness. The results show that the f
actors which trigger professional consultation are related to the ever
yday demands of work, home and other people on the one hand, and to th
e interpretation of bodily symptoms on the other. Characteristically,
symptom interpretation often involves a veiled dialogue with the tax-f
unded municipal health care system about a justification for the lay d
iagnosis. The results further show a domination of biomedical illness
explanations among the patients studied. A third of the explanations c
oncerned infectious, toxic and noxious agents, and a quarter constitut
ional defects in the body. Ten per cent were philosophical and metaphy
sical, and 16 per cent psychosocial in nature. The remainder were base
d on life style and risk behaviour, and on problems of medical care. T
he results are discussed from the standpoint of lay and professional m
odels of explanation for illness.