Objectives: Vasoconstrictors are often used in gynaecology for vaginal
surgery. Ornipressin was prohibited in France in 1990 and we studied
the haemodynamic effect of a structural analogue marketed in France, l
ysine-vasopressin infused locally at the operative field. Methods: Fou
r haemodynamic parameters were evaluated in 7 patients undergoing surg
ery via the vaginal route under epidural anaesthesia (lidocain 2%). Ar
terial pressure and heart rate were measured nonivasively and thoracic
bioimpedance was used for measuring cardiac index and systemic vascul
ar resistance, Baseline levels were obtained after induction of anaest
hesia and positioning the patient. Five units of lysine-vasopressin di
luted in 20 ml of 9 parts per thousand saline solution were infused lo
cally into the cervix. Haemodynamic measures were made for 15 minutes.
Results: Five minutes after infusion, there was a significant increas
e in systolic (+21+/-7%) and diastolic (+29+/-9%) arterial pressure (p
<0.05) (Mann and Whitney U test). There was a tendancy for bradycardia
which did not reach significance. The systemic arterial resistances w
ere increased from 3080+/-178 to 4965+/-227 ohm/m(3) with concomitant
drom in systolic index from 2.6+/-0.3 to 1.6+/-0.11 min/m(2). The obse
rved haemodynamic effects were similar to those obtained with onipress
in and corresponded to a sudden increase in post-charge. Cardiac toler
ance was poor with a drop in systolic index to a level corresponding t
o a fall in cardiac inotropism and coronary blood now. Conclusion: Wit
h this product, the patients are exposed to the same diseases and acci
dents described for ornipressin and thus should be used with extreme c
are, in adapted situations by competent experienced surgeons for patie
nts without cardiovascular or cerebral diseases.