Jp. Laissy et al., THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION - DIAGNOSIS WITH TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS MR-IMAGING, Radiology, 194(2), 1995, pp. 331-336
PURPOSE: To compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and magneti
c resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of dissection of the thoraci
c aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with c
linically suspected aortic dissection and 10 postoperative patients un
derwent transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography and MR imaging.
Imaging results were compared at independent double-blind readings. F
inal diagnosis was obtained from consensual review of all corroborativ
e studies. RESULTS: MR imaging depicted the intimal flap in 95% of aor
tic dissections; TEE, in 86% (P < .05). In surgical patients, the sens
itivity of MR in detection of residual dissection was 100% versus 86%
with TEE (P < .05). The inferior extent of the dissected lumen was see
n only with MR imaging. False-positive results occurred in two cases w
ith TEE and in one with MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is superior
to TEE in the evaluation and follow-up of dissection of the thoracic
aorta. Because the availability of MR is limited, however, TEE should
remain the standard modality for diagnosis.