CLINICAL STAGE-I ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - PITFALLS IN PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH MR-IMAGING - WORK-IN-PROGRESS

Citation
Lm. Scoutt et al., CLINICAL STAGE-I ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - PITFALLS IN PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT WITH MR-IMAGING - WORK-IN-PROGRESS, Radiology, 194(2), 1995, pp. 567-572
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00338419
Volume
194
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
567 - 572
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(1995)194:2<567:CSEC-P>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify potential pitfalls in using magnetic resonance (M R) imaging to determine the depth of myometrial invasion in patients w ith clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For ty women with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma underwent preoper ative pelvic MR imaging. Uterine length, tumor signal intensity, appea rance of the junctional zone, presence of large polypoid tumors, leiom yomata, and congenital uterine anomalies were analyzed. Univariate log istic-regression analysis was performed to identify associations betwe en incorrect MR staging and these variables. RESULTS: MR staging of IA , IB, and IC disease was 55% accurate (22 of 40 cases); MR differentia tion of deep myometrial invasion (stage IC) from superficial disease ( stages IA and IB) was 78% accurate (31 of 40 cases). Older age (P =.02 5), presence of polypoid tumors (P =.025), and difficulty in pathologi c staging (P <.005) were significantly associated with incorrect MR as sessment. CONCLUSION: When present, large polypoid tumors, leiomyomata , congenital anomalies, small uteri, and indistinct zonal anatomy may make it difficult to assess myometrial invasion at MR imaging.