Sp. Suhonen et al., INTRAUTERINE AND SUBDERMAL PROGESTIN ADMINISTRATION IN POSTMENOPAUSALHORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY, Fertility and sterility, 63(2), 1995, pp. 336-342
Objective: To compare the effects of intrauterine and subdermal admini
stration of levonorgestrel on control of bleeding and on the endometri
um in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Interventions: Ninet
een women started continuous oral E(2) valerate therapy (2 mg daily) t
ogether with continuous parenteral progestin therapy. The subjects ran
domly received either a subdermal levonorgestrel-releasing implant (n
= 9) or an intrauterine device (IUD) releasing levonorgestrel (n = 10)
. Main Outcome Measures: Serum concentrations of estrone, E(2), FSH, s
ex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and levonorgestrel were followed. E
ndometrial biopsies and transvaginal ultrasonography were used to eval
uate the endometrium. The subjects kept daily records of bleeding. The
observation time was 1 year. Results: Serum concentrations of the hor
mones mentioned above and SHBG were similar in both groups during the
observation time, but the patterns of bleeding differed. In the IUD gr
oup there were 0.9 days (mean, range 0 to 4 days) of spotting and no d
ays of bleeding during the last month of the follow-up year. In the im
plant group there were 8 days (mean, range 0 to 25 days) of spotting a
nd 3.4 days (mean, range 0 to 14 days) of bleeding. In histological ex
amination there was uniform atrophy in the endometrial samples from th
e IUD group, and a weak or absent progestin effect in the implant grou
p. Conclusions: In spite of similar serum levonorgestrel concentration
s, local intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel resulted in bet
ter control of bleeding and in more effective endometrial suppression
than subdermal administration.