MONITORING VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS DURING RETRACTION OF THE CANINE OPTIC-NERVE - PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF UNROOFING THE OPTIC CANAL

Citation
A. Akabane et al., MONITORING VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS DURING RETRACTION OF THE CANINE OPTIC-NERVE - PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF UNROOFING THE OPTIC CANAL, Journal of neurosurgery, 82(2), 1995, pp. 284-287
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223085
Volume
82
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
284 - 287
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(1995)82:2<284:MVPDRO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of unroofing the optic canal during retraction of the optic nerve, the authors monitored changes in visual evoked po tentials (VEPs) stimulated by a light-emitting diode in the canine mod el. At rest, an early VEP wave was reliably observed with an amplitude of 8.2 +/- 0.6 mu V and a latency of 51.5 +/- 0.7 msec; this wave was named N50. The intracranial optic nerve was retracted using a weight of 5, 10 or 50 g. The earliest change in VEP noted during retraction w as a reduction in N50 wave amplitude. The length of time required unti l N50 amplitude decreased to 50% of the control group (T50) was 10.7 /- 1.8 minutes with a weight of 5 g, 4.9 +/- 0.7 minutes with 10 g, an d 2.9 +/- 0.4 minutes with 50 g, with statistically significant differ ences between the groups. Retraction of the optic nerve with all weigh ts finally resulted in the disappearance of the N50 wave. The amplitud e of the N50 wave recovered fully to control size when retraction was released immediately after the wave disappeared. The time course of am plitude recovery did not differ significantly between groups. Unroofin g the optic canal prolonged the T50 during retraction significantly to 20.7 +/- 2.9 minutes with a weight of 5 g, 18.9 +/- 4.2 with 10 g, an d 9.0 +/- 2.4 with 50 g. These results demonstrate that unroofing the optic canal can protect the optic nerve from damage during operations that require optic nerve retraction.