ANHEDONIA OR ANERGIA - EFFECTS OF HALOPERIDOL AND NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS DOPAMINE DEPLETION ON INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE SELECTION IN A T-MAZE COST-BENEFIT PROCEDURE
Jd. Salamone et al., ANHEDONIA OR ANERGIA - EFFECTS OF HALOPERIDOL AND NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS DOPAMINE DEPLETION ON INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE SELECTION IN A T-MAZE COST-BENEFIT PROCEDURE, Behavioural brain research, 65(2), 1994, pp. 221-229
Two experiments were conducted to study the role of dopamine in the pe
rformance of a novel cost/benefit procedure. Rats were trained on a T-
maze task in which one arm contained a high reinforcement density (4 x
45 mg Bioserve pellets) and the other arm contained a low reinforceme
nt density (2 x 45 mg pellets). Different groups of rats were trained
either with unobstructed access to both arms from the start area, or u
nder a condition in which a large vertical barrier (44 cm) was placed
in the arm that contained the high density of food reinforcement. In t
he first experiment, rats trained under each procedure received inject
ions of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol and tartaric acid vehicle as a control p
rocedure. Analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant
effect of the barrier on maze arm choice, a significant effect of halo
peridol, and a significant drug x barrier interaction. Haloperidol did
not affect arm choice in rats tested without the barrier present, but
this drug significantly reduced the number of selections of the arm w
ith high reinforcement density when the barrier was present. In the se
cond experiment, groups of rats were trained as described above, and t
hen received intraaccumbens injections of 6-hydroxydopamine or ascorba
te vehicle. Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions produced by 6-hydrox
ydopamine decreased the number of selections of the arm with high rein
forcement density when the barrier was present, but had no effect on a
rm choice when the barrier was not present. These results indicate tha
t blockade of dopamine receptors or depletion of accumbens dopamine di
d not affect the discrimination of different reinforcement densities,
nor alter response selection based on reinforcement magnitude. Thus, t
he present findings are not consistent with the notion that 0.1 mg/kg
haloperidol or nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion fundamentally affe
cted the process of food reinforcement. Rather, the present results ar
e consistent with the notion that haloperidol and nucleus accumbens do
pamine depletions affected instrumental response selection based upon
the kinetic requirements of the instrumental response.