Gk. Steinberg et al., NEUROPROTECTION BY N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONISTS IN FOCAL CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA IS DEPENDENT ON CONTINUED MAINTENANCE DOSING, Neuroscience, 64(1), 1995, pp. 99-107
While N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists have been shown to attenuate ne
uronal damage in focal cerebral ischemia, few studies have examined wh
ether continous or multiple dose treatment is necessary for maximum ef
ficacy. We studied the effect of a loading dose only or load plus main
tenance infusion using several non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate an
tagonists (dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, MK-801) and the levorotatory
enantiomer of dextromethorphan (levomethorphan) in a rabbit model of
focal cerebral ischemia. Forty-seven anesthetized rabbits underwent oc
clusion of the left internal carotid, anterior cerebral and middle cer
ebral arteries for 2 h followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Drugs were admi
nistered 10 min after occlusion. Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan prot
ected against ischemic edema only when given as load plus maintenance
(29% and 31% reduction, respectively), while both load only and load p
lus maintenance MK-801 protected against edema (26% and 31% reduction,
respectively). Levomethorphan load plus maintenance also protected ag
ainst ischemic edema (25% reduction). However, dextromethorphan and de
xtrorphan both required maintenance infusion to protect against ischem
ic neuronal damage (24% and 27% reduction in area of ischemic neuronal
damage, respectively), while levomethorphan failed to protect against
neuronal injury even when given as load plus maintenance. Administrat
ion of MK-801 as load plus maintenance reduced ischemic neuronal damag
e by 23%, but this difference was not quite statistically significant.
These results suggest that processes of ischemic damage, such as exci
totoxic injury, continue for several hours beyond the initial period o
f focal ischemia, and that non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antago
nists require more prolonged administration to achieve neuroprotection
. This may have important implications for understanding the pathophys
iological mechanisms of ischemic neuronal death as well as the treatme
nt of clinical stroke using these drugs.