Objective-To evaluate changes in QT dispersion and components of the Q
T interval in patients admitted with unstable angina and acute myocard
ial infarction and to study the dynamics of these changes in patients
with infarction. Methods-Prospective study recording electrocardiogram
s at 50 mm/s in patients admitted with typical cardiac chest pain. Sub
sequent confirmation of acute myocardial infarction according to stand
ard criteria. Single blind analysis for QT dispersion and QT component
s using a digitiser and simple computer program. Results are expressed
as native QT dispersion, QTc dispersion, and the QT dispersion ratio
defined as QT dispersion divided by cycle length and expressed as a pe
rcentage. Results-QT dispersion, QTc dispersion, and QT dispersion rat
io were all higher in patients with acute myocardial infarction than i
n those with unstable angina (mean (SD) 66 (18) ms, 75 (26) ms(1/2), a
nd 8.1 (24.) % compared with 38 (13) ms, 39 (13) ms', and 4.5 (1.7) %
respectively). Dynamic changes in QTc dispersion were seen after acute
infarction with significant differences in the QT components occurrin
g between the different patient groups. Levels of QT dispersion (87 (1
5) ms), QTc dispersion (105 (17) ms(1/2)), and QT dispersion ratio (11
.7 (0.8) %) in the four patients with ventricular fibrillation were si
gnificantly higher. Use of QT dispersion ratio gave a narrower confide
nce interval. Conclusion-QT dispersion is increased after myocardial i
nfarction and levels are higher in patients with ventricular fibrillat
ion. The changes in QT dispersion are dynamic and may reflect the chan
ging pattern of underlying ventricular recovery of ventricular excitab
ility, which is profoundly disturbed in the earliest phase of acute in
farction. Expressing QT dispersion as a percentage of cycle length (QT
dispersion ratio) rather than using standard rate correction may be s
uperior in identifying patients who develop ventricular fibrillation.