Ml. Fernandezguerrero et al., HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIOUS ENDOCARDITIS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH CARDIAC-SURGERY - AN EMERGING PROBLEM, Clinical infectious diseases, 20(1), 1995, pp. 16-23
To assess the most relevant features of hospital-acquired endocarditis
, we conducted a retrospective study of cases of infectious endocardit
is at a single university hospital from 1978 through 1992. During this
period 248 episodes of infectious endocarditis were documented; 23 (9
.3%) of these episodes were hospital-acquired and were not associated
with cardiac surgery. (This figure represented a remarkable rise in th
e frequency of nosocomial endocarditis, only one case of which was ide
ntified among 101 cases of endocarditis treated at the same institutio
n between 1960 and 1975.) In each of the 23 nosocomial cases, endocard
itis was the result of bacteremia associated with a hospital-based pro
cedure: intravenous catheterization (15 cases), instrumentation of a d
iseased urogenital tract (seven cases), or liver biopsy (one case). St
aphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were the predominant org
anisms isolated from intravenous catheters and the urogenital tract, r
espectively. Two of seven enterococcal isolates were highly resistant
to gentamicin (MIC, >2,000 mu g/mL). Overall mortality was 56%. Two su
bsets of at-risk patients with different anatomic and clinical manifes
tations were identified. Out results emphasize that infectious endocar
ditis must be considered a serious nosocomial hazard against which pre
ventive measures must be implemented.