Counterfactuals generated by victims of traumatic events were examined
to elucidate their significance for the coping process. In Study 1, r
espondents were interviewed 4-7 years after the loss of their spouse o
r child in a motor vehicle accident. In Study 2, respondents were inte
rviewed at 3 weeks and 18 months following the death of their child fr
om Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Across both studies, (a) counterfactu
als were commonly reported; (b) the focus of counterfactuals was typic
ally on one's own (in)actions, rather than on the behavior of others;
(c) the more frequently respondents were undoing the event, the more d
istress they reported; and (d) this relation held after controlling fo
r more general ruminations. These field studies demonstrate that even
in situations that lack the highly mutable circumstances described in
scenario research, people coping with traumatic events appear unhinder
ed in their ability to generate counterfactuals. Theoretical implicati
ons, with an emphasis on field studies of undoing, are discussed.