ACCURACY CF DUPLEX VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAROTID SURGERY

Citation
Mj. Boyle et al., ACCURACY CF DUPLEX VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAROTID SURGERY, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 88(1), 1995, pp. 20-23
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
01410768
Volume
88
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
20 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0141-0768(1995)88:1<20:ACDVAI>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The operative findings of 23 carotid arteries were compared with pre-o perative duplex scans and angiography. Both duplex and angiography had a high degree of accuracy in detecting haemodynamically significant l esions of 50-99% (88 and 92%, respectively). Their accuracy, however, in correctly predicting the grade of stenosis was significantly lower; 30 and 48%, respectively (P<0.001). They each exhibited an accuracy o f 70% and 78%, respectively, in the detection of ulceration. Overall, both duplex and angiography displayed an accuracy of 87% in indicating the proper management course. The combination of bath investigations increased this accuracy to 94.6%. In severely stenotic lesions, duplex to rule out occlusion was not reliable. On statistical analysis, ther e was no difference between duplex and angiography in predicting haemo dynamically significant lesions of 50-99%, estimating the grade of ste nosis, the detection of ulceration, or indicating the proper managemen t course. In most situations, duplex alone equalled the accuracy of an giography in the pre-operative assessment of patients for carotid surg ery. For stenotic lesions of >90%, however, we recommend supplemental angiography to rule out occlusion.