Js. Carlson et al., PREVALENCE AND TREATMENT OF SELECTIVE MUTISM IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - ASURVEY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRISTS, Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 4(4), 1994, pp. 281-291
This study investigates the use of medications by child and adolescent
psychiatrists for treating selective mutism. In 1993, a one-page surv
ey was mailed to 962 child and adolescent psychiatrists selected at ra
ndom from approximately 2500 active members of the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Of the 962 questionnaires sent, 411
were returned (return rate 43%) and 308 were completed (sample partici
pation rate 32%). A prevalence estimate of selective mutism within a c
linical sample was calculated to be 1 case of selective mutism per 936
new patients (0.11%). Less than two-thirds (199/308) of the respondin
g psychiatrists reported having treated a child with selective mutism
in their practice. Of those who had treated a child with selective mut
ism, 36% (n = 71) reported having prescribed medication for this disor
der. Antidepressants were the most frequently endorsed medication for
being potentially beneficial in treating a hypothetical case example a
nd, in addition, for being actually used by child psychiatrists in cli
nical practice for children diagnosed with selective mutism. Antianxie
ty agents were reported, at much lower rates, to be potentially useful
in a hypothetical case and actually used in clinical practice for tre
ating children with this disorder. These findings suggest that child p
sychiatrists may view selective mutism as being related to, having sym
ptoms similar to, or often presenting comorbidly with depressive or an
xiety disorders. However, a therapeutic program that includes pharmaco
therapy was endorsed as the most effective treatment modality for sele
ctive mutism by only 14% of the reporting psychiatrists. Psychiatrists
' impressions and observations cannot, even collectively, be used to m
ake clinical inferences about the usefulness of treatments. This study
did not examine treatment efficacy, since the outcomes of these open
clinical trials were not judged by independent observers but were repo
rted as observed and recollected by the clinicians involved. Moreover,
these data on the treatment practices of sampled members of the Ameri
can Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry may not reflect the pra
ctices of other psychiatrists or pediatricians. The results indicate t
hat child and adolescent psychiatrists are prescribing a variety of me
dications for selective mutism without the benefit of adequate efficac
y studies. There is a significant need for further research and dissem
ination of information in this area.