2 APPROACHES TO THE MEASUREMENT OF ADAPTIVE STYLE - COMPARISON OF NORMAL, PSYCHOSOMATICALLY ILL, AND DELINQUENT ADOLESCENTS

Objective: This project evaluated the discriminant validity of two sel f-report measures of adaptive styles. Method: The Weinberger Adjustmen t Inventory, which assesses distress, restraint, denial, and repressiv e defensiveness, and the Bond Defense Style Questionnaire, which asses ses immature, neurotic, and mature defenses, were administered to 272 adolescents: normal comparison group boys (n = 63), normal comparison group girls (n = 68), girls with psychosomatic disorders (n = 75), and incarcerated delinquent boys (n = 66). Multivariate analyses of covar iance, analyses of covariance, and discriminant analyses (with socioec onomic status and age as covariates) were conducted. Results: Adaptive styles from the Defense Style Questionnaire differentiated the adoles cent groups better than did the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory styles . Conclusion: Measurement of adaptive style by the Defense Style Quest ionnaire may be a useful adjunct to other measures of psychopthology a nd can assist in assessment of risk, treatment planning, and treatment progress.