T. Khan et al., ELECTRICAL-FIELD DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE INJURED CAT SPINAL-CORD - INJURY POTENTIALS AND FIELD DISTRIBUTION, Journal of neurotrauma, 11(6), 1994, pp. 699-710
This study investigated the spontaneous injury potentials measured aft
er contusion or transection injury to the cat spinal cord. In addition
, the distribution of electrical field potentials on the surface and w
ithin the spinal cord were measured following applied electrical field
s after transection and contusion injuries. After transection of the s
pinal cord, the injury potentials were -19.8 +/- 2.6 mV; after contusi
on of the spinal cord, the injury potentials were -9.5 +/- 2.2 mV. The
se potentials returned to control values within 2.5-4 h after injury.
The electrical field distribution measured on the dorsal surface, as w
ell as within the spinal cord, after the application of a 10 mu A curr
ent, showed little difference between contusion and transection injuri
es. Scalar potential fields were measured using two configurations of
stimulating electrodes: dorsal to dorsal (D-D), in which both electrod
es were placed epidurally on the dorsal surface of the spinal cord, an
d ventral to dorsal (V-D), in which one electrode was placed dorsally
and one ventrally. As reported in normal uninjured cats, the total cur
rent in the midsagittal plane for the D-D configuration was largely co
nfined to the dorsal portion of the spinal cord; with the V-D configur
ation, the current distribution was uniform throughout the spinal cord
. In the injured spinal cord, the equipotential lines midway between t
he stimulating electrodes have a wider separation than in the uninjure
d spinal cord. Because the magnitude of the electrical field E is equa
l to the current density J multiplied by the resistivity r, this sugge
sts that either the current density is reduced or that the resistivity
is reduced.