COMPARISON OF THE PROFITABILITY OF ORGANI C AND TRANSITIONAL CEREAL FARMS WITH CONVENTIONAL FARMS IN QUEBEC

Citation
N. Paillat et al., COMPARISON OF THE PROFITABILITY OF ORGANI C AND TRANSITIONAL CEREAL FARMS WITH CONVENTIONAL FARMS IN QUEBEC, Canadian journal of agricultural economics, 42(3), 1994, pp. 343-354
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,"AgricultureEconomics & Policy
ISSN journal
00083976
Volume
42
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
343 - 354
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-3976(1994)42:3<343:COTPOO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Financial data for 92 conventional farms, cropping at least 20 hectare s of small grains, and 21 organic farms, cropping at least 15 hectares of cereals, have been extracted from the Quebec Agritel data bank for comparisons. Conventional farms are formed into four groups: low inpu t level (LIL), high input level (HIL), low yield (extensive) and high yield (intensive). Relative to conventional farms with regard to cerea ls and barley, organic farms have significantly lower yields and costs , although gross returns and profitability are similar. Subsidies are important and represent a high proportion of the profitability for bot h organic and conventional farms. Compared with the four conventional groups, organic farms' gross return falls between the more profitable (LIL and intensive groups) and the least (HIL and extensive groups). I n conclusion, completely different production systems can lead to simi lar economic results, at least in the short term.