Sorex monticolus and Sorex vagrans usually are identified by use of ti
ne characters of the upper incisors. Because not all specimens are cle
arly identifiable by tine characters, I used four cranial measurements
thought to be useful characters by those familiar with the genus Sore
x. Univariate and bivariate comparisons did not yield reliable methods
of discrimination. Discriminant analysis permitted identification of
many of the unidentified specimens. A comparison of qualitative tine c
haracter states in members of the two species groups in British Columb
ia, as identified by discriminant analysis, provided no universal diff
erences in these characters. Using the position of the medial tine rel
ative to pigment levels is still the best means of discriminating betw
een these two species of Sorex. Final curation of the collection sugge
sted the level of pigment and size of tine on the upper first incisor
were the two characters that varied most consistently with identificat
ions of the two species determined by discriminant analysis. Use of di
scriminant analysis has proven helpful when attempting to identify oth
er taxa of mammals when key characters are confusing or missing.