This paper tries to shed a fresh light on the use of several key terms
in traditional Chinese medicine (and philosophy) related to the theor
y of so-called systematic correspondence. Drawing on some influential
works in Chinese science and civilization (e.g., Marcel Granet, Joseph
Needham, Nathan Sivin), the paper argues that the idea of rhythm, pro
perly defined, should become an organizing idea in studying the tradit
ions of Chinese thinking and practice in medicine as well as in genera
l. Rhythmicity is not periodicity (though they are inseparable from on
e another) and the idea of rhythm is more useful (than for example the
notion of correspondence) for medical anthropology. The paper is divi
ded into three parts: 1) the idea of rhythm in some key terms of tradi
tional Chinese medicine, 2) the Chinese theory of resonance versus the
idea of rhythm, and 3) the relation of resonance, rhythm and ecstatic
experiences with respect to medical anthropology. An acquaintance wit
h the arguments of my previous article in these pages will be helpful
but not necessary for the present paper.