Lm. Cole et al., DROSOPHILA GABA-GATED CHLORIDE CHANNEL - MODIFIED [H-3] EBOB BINDING-SITE ASSOCIATED WITH ALA-]SER OR GLY MUTANTS OF RDL SUBUNIT, Life sciences, 56(10), 1995, pp. 757-765
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Medicine, Research & Experimental","Pharmacology & Pharmacy
The non-competitive blocker site of the GABA-gated chloride ion channe
l in normal susceptible strains of Drosophila melanogaster and simulan
s binds 4-n-[H-3]propyl-4'-ethynylbicycloorthobenzoate ([H-3]EBOB) spe
cific sites with K(d)s of 1.6-1.9 nM and B(max)s of 171-181 fmol/mg pr
otein. This specific binding of [H-3]EBOB is strongly inhibited by: a
large number and variety of insecticidal channel blockers at 20 nM (li
ndane, alpha-endosulfan, dieldrin, 12-ketoendrin, fipronil, and a repr
esentative bicycloorthobenzoate and dithiane) or 200 nM (picrotoxinin)
; the insecticidal channel activators avermectin and moxidectin at 20
nM; muscimol at 30 mu M and GABA at 300 mu M. Cyclodiene resistance in
D. melanogaster has been attributed to a mutation resulting in an Ala
(302) --> Ser replacement in the Rdl GABA receptor subunit and in D. s
imulans to an homologous Ala --> Ser or Gly replacement. These mutatio
ns are shown here to greatly reduce [H-3]EBOB binding, i.e. lower affi
nity and apparent number of binding sites. The Ala --> Ser replacement
with both melanogaster and simulans almost always reduces the potency
in inhibiting [H-3]EBOB binding of each of eight channel blockers and
of muscimol and GABA. The Ala --> Gly replacement in D. simulans is g
enerally less effective than the Ala --> Ser modification in reducing
sensitivity to the channel blockers and to muscimol and GABA. The chan
nel activators avermectin and moxidectin usually retain their inhibito
ry potency in the Rdl subunit mutants. Thus, it appears that replaceme
nt of the Ala by Ser generally modifies the non-competitive blocker si
te and its coupling to the AGBA-recognition site with less effect on t
he channel activator site. In contrast, the Ala --> Gly replacement ha
s less impact in protecting the chloride channel from the action of in
secticidal blockers. Each of the resistant strains has the same level
of resistance to the lethal action of the five channel blockers examin
ed but none to avermectins and muscimol.